This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Winship, G. Articles by Repper, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Focus Group Research

The Role of Cacophony in Dialogical Democracy

Nottingham University, UK,gary.winship{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Julie Repper

This article considers the philosophical underpinnings that have shadowed the emergence of focus group methods as a counterpoise to positivist research design. Examples of the application of focus group methods are drawn from two studies where the voices of marginalized groups were facilitated: 1) focus groups with patients diagnosed with personality disorder; and 2) focus groups with gypsy travellers. In both groups there were varying degrees of coherence in communication although particular attention here is paid to the role of dissonance and `negative dialectics' in the formation of opinion. Data generation in focus groups is considered in relation to group size, structure and clinical techniques.

Key Words: focus group • focus group research • cacophony • dialogical democracy • group conversation

Group Analysis, Vol. 40, No. 1, 125-139 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0533316407076126


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?