Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Group Analysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scholz, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Self-esteem and the Process of its Reassessment in Multicultural Groups: Renegotiating the Symbolic Social Order

Regine Scholz

IGA Muenster

Based on the assumption that one dimension of each group is the ongoing struggle for personal recognition, the thesis is made that in groups of multicultural/multinational composition it is possible to study how personal self-esteem reflects on a social order and the own respected place therein. Group members from different social orders (cultures) are confronted with the task to work out the significance/meaning/value of basic dimensions such as gender, social class, religious upbringing, etc. whilst trying to get their personal self-esteem validated by the group. This process takes place in a situation of relative power imbalance between members of the majority culture and those of the minority group, who tend to depreciate each other due to deeply in-rooted stereotypes - the group has to work on dimensions of the foundation matrices in order to establish its dynamic matrix. A model is suggested, why this process implies such a high potential of insecurity, fostering anxiety and aggression with the menace of total breakdown of communication. Different power potentials of the different subgroups are outlined as reflections of a wider scope of power relations in society and the historic dimension of the foundation matrix is emphasized.

Key Words: foundation matrix • group process • multicultural groups • self-esteem • social order

Group Analysis, Vol. 37, No. 4, 525-535 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0533316404045529


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?