|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Group in Foulkes
Tom Ormay
Editorial Board of the British Journal of Psychotherapy
The need for a drive theory in group analysis and psychoanalysis is argued for; especially against the background of recent advances in genetics. The old drive theories were not adequate and created confusion on several levels. With the application of the social drive a direct understanding of our social nature becomes possible. A discrete social function of the personality is proposed. It supports the Foulkesian view of people.
Key Words: drive genetics narcissism nos social
Group Analysis, Vol. 34, No. 1,
169-177 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0533316401341016

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Weinberg
So What is this Social Unconscious Anyway?
Group Analysis,
September 1, 2007;
40(3):
307 - 322.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Hopper
Theoretical and Conceptual Notes Concerning Transference and Countertransference Processes in Groups and by Groups, and the Social Unconscious: Part III
Group Analysis,
June 1, 2007;
40(2):
285 - 300.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Ormay
Commentary on `Free Associations, Free Floating Discussions and Group Thought' by Claudio Neri
Group Analysis,
September 1, 2003;
36(3):
357 - 361.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Dalal
The Social Unconscious: A Post-Foulkesian Perspective
Group Analysis,
December 1, 2001;
34(4):
539 - 555.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|