Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Group Analysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hall, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Mullee, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Undertaking Psychotherapy Research

Zaida Hall

Department of Psychiatry, an honorary consultant psychotherapist at the Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton,

Mark Mullee

Department of Medical Statistics and Computing, University of Southampton.

This article argues for more research and audit by group psychotherapists in order to inform clinical practice and to influence resource allocation. Problems encountered in research are described. The need for careful planning is emphasized. The choice of outcome measures is discussed and also the choice of research protocol by symptom questionnaire or by change in use of psychiatric services. An account is given of the CORE outcome measure. Reasons for missing data are given and ways are suggested of analysing incomplete data that can provide useful information, using as an example figures from our outcome study on a slow-open group of 94 patients.

Key Words: CORE measure • group psychotherapy • missing data • outcome research

Group Analysis, Vol. 33, No. 3, 319-332 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/05333160022077371
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Group AnalysisHome page
D. Nitzgen
Special Section: Contemporary Clinical Challenges of Group Analysis Group Analysis
Group Analysis, September 1, 2006; 39(3): 295 - 303.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group AnalysisHome page
S. Conway, K. Audin, M. Barkham, J. Mellor-Clark, and S. Russell
Practice-Based Evidence for a Brief Time-Intensive Multi-Modal Therapy Guided by Group-Analytic Principles and Method
Group Analysis, September 1, 2003; 36(3): 413 - 435.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group AnalysisHome page
A. Mittwoch
Our Place in the World of Science: What is at Stake?
Group Analysis, December 1, 2001; 34(4): 431 - 448.
[PDF]