Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Group Analysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohn, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Matrix and Intersubjectivity: Phenomenological Aspects of Group Analysis

Hans W. Cohn

School of Psychotherapy and Counselling, Regent's College, London

In the course of this century there has been a shit from a view of man as a self-contained structured entity, open to outside influences but clearly set off against the rest of the world, to a perspective from which man is seen as being-in-the-world-with-others, a world to which man is inseparably linked. This change of perspective shows itself in philosophy in a move from an extreme subjectivism (which in 1943 still pervaded Jean-Paul Sartre's Being and Nothingness) to a complete dismissal of the subject (as proposed, for instance, by Michel Foucault). Similarly in psychotherapy, the move has been from the self-centred individualistic approaches of various forms of psychoanalysis to certain types of family therapy where the subject seems completely absorbed by the `system'. In this development, Maurice Merleau-Ponty and S.H. Foulkes hold a half-way position. They do not abandon the notion of a subject but open it up and decentre it. `Meaning and significance', to use Foulkes's words, rest o longer within the subject but between subjects. Matrix and intersubjectivity are the relevant fields of experience.

Group Analysis, Vol. 26, No. 4, 481-486 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0533316493264008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group AnalysisHome page
N. Diamond
Can We Speak of Internal and External Reality?
Group Analysis, September 1, 1996; 29(3): 303 - 317.
[Abstract]


Home page
Group AnalysisHome page
Nicola Diamond Replies to Dennis Brown
Group Analysis, September 1, 1996; 29(3): 320 - 323.