Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Group Analysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Catina, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tschuschke, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Summary of Empirical Data from the Investigation of Two Psychoanalytic Groups by Means of Repertory Grid Technique

Ana Catina

Centre for Psychotherapy Research, Stuttgart

Volker Tschuschke

University of Ulm

Two inpatient psychoanalytic therapy groups were investigated by sequential applications of repertory grid technique (Kelly, 1955) and a method for rating interactive behaviour in groups (Orlik, 1986). Results concerning characteristics of construing at the beginning of therapy, and the process of change during therapy, discriminating successful patients from unsuccessful ones, are presented. Therapy process factors contributing to change of construing of the self in relation to significant others are suggested and the contribution of interactional behaviour in the group to the development of therapy process as well as to treatment outcome is considered.

Group Analysis, Vol. 26, No. 4, 433-447 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0533316493264005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Group AnalysisHome page
S. Lorentzen
Special Section: Contemporary Challenges for Research in Group Analysis
Group Analysis, September 1, 2006; 39(3): 321 - 340.
[Abstract] [PDF]