This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Westcott, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Group Analysis and Religion: Is there a Common Ground? Ideas Arising from Paper by Gregory van der Kleij

De la Salle House, 140 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 7BP, UK

Psychoanalysis, group analysis and religion are paradoxical processes involving people and change. Itzig's principle of asking the horse not the rider is a good starting point in searching for connections between group analysis and religion, for this captures in metaphor some of the purposes of religious practices and the group analyst's work of assisting members of groups to be carried on their journeys by the transcendent or within the psychic envelope of the group matrix (Foulkes, 1973). The horse is symbolic of the life force, of the total Other (Buber, 1933), of the mass of humanness within which we are born, shaped and die, of the whole universe which carries us into the future together. It reminds me of the parabolic story of the Sower, which throws the listener into life and the fear of it, and of Balaam's Ass, who knows what lies ahead, while the man astride, unaware of his ignorance, slowly realizes this and is afraid. We do not know what the next paragraph will be or what will occur tomorrow. As van der Kleij says (this issue p. 27), it takes a daring `soul' to confront such inadequacy and then express it.

Group Analysis, Vol. 26, No. 1, 39-53 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0533316493261004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?