Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Group Analysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woods, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Omnipotence Versus Therapeutic Response in Group-Analytic Therapy

John Woods

Central Middlesex Hospital, London

This paper was presented to the Institute of Group Analysis, London, in July 1990, at the end of the qualifying course. It describes the work of a once-weekly group for psychiatric outpatients in a hospital setting. The therapeutic process is discussed in terms of Donald Winnicott's theory. Included also are comments on the author's personal and professional development during the course of training.

Group Analysis, Vol. 25, No. 2, 183-193 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0533316492252005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Group AnalysisHome page
R. Green
The Deadly Embrace: An Approach to Abusive Relationships
Group Analysis, June 1, 1998; 31(2): 197 - 211.
[Abstract]